tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12098207.post9221044998857462998..comments2009-06-05T02:13:26.550-05:00Melanie (Stone) Perryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03812184646282811013noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12098207.post-58862815400517695822009-06-05T02:13:26.550-05:002009-06-05T02:13:26.550-05:00Nice blog!control valveshttp://www.meaincorporated.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12098207.post-6306318423584726652008-06-13T15:33:00.000-05:002008-06-13T15:33:00.000-05:00Thanks, Steve. I deleted it so I'm no longer linking back to his site then. <BR/><BR/>"Anonymous" (haven't you got a name?'), if you think I'm a liar, fine, I don't know you, you don't know me... but, since you didn't program the site, then you cannot honestly state that it is NOT anonymous.<BR/><BR/>It *needs* to be tracked THAT a user has taken the survey (although the records of the survey results are separate). Period. I don't care about duplicate responses as much as I care that we don't have a free for all with people skewing the findings as much as they want. One person could wreak A LOT of havoc without once exactly duplicating his/her entry if they're allowed to do it anonymously.Melanie (Stone) Perryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03812184646282811013noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12098207.post-31424600326796109142008-06-13T13:25:00.000-05:002008-06-13T13:25:00.000-05:00It's not anonymous if you have to log in.<BR/><BR/>You can track duplicate responses in other ways.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12098207.post-44342293819070490682008-06-13T08:36:00.000-05:002008-06-13T08:36:00.000-05:00Melanie, it's hand-written spam. I got a bunch from this guy on my blog too. It's gone now.Steve Johnsonhttp://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/noreply@blogger.com